My Photo

Partners

Blog powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

  • The individuals who post here work at SharedBook Inc. and SharedBook Ltd (collectively “SharedBook”). The opinions expressed here are their own and may not reflect the opinions of SharedBook. The information here is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date and SharedBook does not warrant the reliability of any advice, opinion, statement of other information displayed here. SharedBook reserves the right to correct any errors or omissions on this blog and to remove any inappropriate comments within the scope of our User Agreement at any time without notice.

Smart Button

« April 2008 | Main | June 2008 »

May 2008

May 30, 2008

We Knew It!

Last year, at the end of June, we launched Blog2Print.  We weren’t alone in thinking that blogging activity would continue to grow, but we did position ourselves squarely in opposition to the naysayers who thought it was a Web 2.0 fad.


Now there’s an interesting survey that shows, for at least one gender, we were right.  BlogHer and Compass Partners have released a study showing that for women, the blogosphere continues to be the place to be seen and heard.  For those of you who like PowerPoint, here’s the actual presentation.  


Among Adult Women online under the age of 75, 53% read blogs, 37% post comments to blogs and 28% write or update blogs.  Further, when you expand the definition to all Adult Women under 75, fully 35% participate in the blogosphere in some form.  And this participation is becoming a habit – if you’re a female blog reader, there’s an 80% likelihood you do so at least once a week.


Judging by some of the books our customers print using Blog2Print, there are some fabulous, highly creative writers out there. So keep it up, ladies!  When you’re ready, we’re here for you.

May 29, 2008

Techtini Pocket Guide Debuts

We have been working with Kristen Nicole to develop the Techtini Pocket Guide, a collaborative project that is designed to showcase individuals and companies in the Web community.

The project was Kristen's idea (inspired by the creation of The Kristini at DEMO earlier this year), and SharedBook's collaborative on-demand publishing platform is making it happen. Proceeds from book sales will support Idealist, a project of Action Without Borders.

We are pleased to report that the site is now live and the Techtini Pocket Guide made its debut at the first TECH cocktail Conference in Chicago earlier today. See below.

Anyone can now add a favorite cocktail recipe and/or produce a book from the recipes that have been posted to date. One note: all content is subject to editorial review. Please allow 24 hours for a newly submitted recipe to become a part of the book.







May 27, 2008

What's in a Name

Unfortunately, I cannot skip the opportunity to quote Shakespeare for this entry.

“A rose by any other name would smell as sweet”

Of course it would!  But it probably wouldn’t sell very well on your Web site.

You can sell roses on your Web site, so long as folks know what a rose is.  It’s all about setting proper user expectations.  Seems simple enough – just call it a rose and you’re set.

But suppose they’ve never heard of what you’re selling.  Suppose it is something that never existed before.  You’ll have to spend some time explaining the item well enough that the user not only knows what it is, but also what it isn’t.  It is important to get the user to understand all of the benefits and uses an item will have, but not overstep the mark and have them think it does more than it actually does.  As an example, if you were going to explain a rose and how wonderful it smells you might need to ensure the user knows that it has an expiration on it.  A 3 week old rose, by every name, no longer smells sweet!

So what if you are not trying to sell an item, but rather a process?  What if you are in charge of the information design for a Web site and it is your job to get a user to understand what happens next?  What if you are trying to sell the user on clicking a button?  It’s all about setting the user's expectations which, turns out, is almost no different from selling anything else.

The first rule is to try to tap into common terminology so that you don’t have to explain too much.  A very common example is the “Add to Cart” button.  Surely the very first Web site that used this phrase had a LOT of explaining to do.  Who back then would have been thinking of a grocery store shopping cart on the Internet?  But now that it is so common, most users know exactly what to expect when they click such a button.  Tap into the user expectations that this phrase evokes by simply using it if it applies.

But not every site does common things and perhaps your site does something unique.  What if you do need to give the user a button that is unlike any other Web site?  This requires more effort and diligence.

Of course, you’ll want to explain it.  You can put some text next to the button saying exactly what happens (and perhaps what won’t).  But know that the average user will not read it.  So now what do you do?

1 - Give it a name.  Try your best to be descriptive without being wordy.  Hope that it will stand on its own and users will understand what it does – or at least be curious enough to try it. 

2 - Keep it consistent.  No matter how much you want to try using different terms in different places on your site – fight the urge.  If you keep changing the name, no user will ever know what is happening.  If you discover it needs to change, then change it everywhere, all at once.  And if that is going to take some time, then let it take time.

3 - Test it.  You’ll be amazed at how an average user interprets the text on a button – no matter how clear you think it is.  Put it in front of someone (anyone you can find who’s game) and ask them to tell you what they think will happen when they click it.  If it turns out you set the wrong expectations (and chances are you have), then ask them, “What would you think it does if it said ____ instead?”  Use this to find a better term and then make a change – but make it pervasively.

Setting the right expectation during a process is critical.  And, in my experience, no one gets it right the first time. 

So what’s in a name?  Sometimes everything.

May 20, 2008

Congratulations

Congratulations to AEIB, the winner of last week's edition of the Comedy Captions contest with Fuelmyblog.

As the winner, AEIB will have the choice of making a Blog2Print book, or another SharedBook product.

May 15, 2008

The Magic Formula for the Right Balance

Lately I’ve been reading about some new methodologies that claim QA resources should be reduced to a minimum.

These so called “advanced” methodologies, mainly related to Web 2.0, argue that although QA is a “necessary evil,” reducing it will allow the development process to be shorter and more dynamic and flexible, giving companies greater strength in the market.

IMHO these progressive approaches have progressed a bit too much. It seems to me they do not take into consideration all the risks involved in such an act.

They do present one proposed solution – developers should become more responsible for their code. They should strive to write without bugs and perform the minimal necessary tests by themselves.

This solution totally contradicts the main purpose of this approach – flexibility, dynamics and quickness – it will take a developer twice as much time to develop a new feature if he tries to fulfill the above tasks, and the development process will become even more complicated and slower as a result.

Although no one knows the feature better than the person who wrote it, a QA person is a trained professional and will be able to produce twice the productivity in half the time.

Our basic assumption is that not all bugs will be found. Therefore QA’s goal is to find as many bugs as possible in a designated time and make sure every bug gets the proper attention.

But as you reduce the QA effort, more and more critical bugs will slip through and find their way into the production site. Those bugs will never go away. They are only hiding, lurking somewhere in the system waiting for the first customer to find them. Such bugs have a tendency to reveal themselves at the worst place and always at the worst time.

Critical bugs need to be fixed at any stage, and it is a known fact that the later you find the bug, the more painful and expensive it will be to fix it.

My experience has shown me that whatever you save in QA you will pay in tech support, and big time. The equation is simple – the less QA you have, the more tech support you will need, and as a QA & tech support manager, I can see both sides of the equation very clearly.

Shorter QA time and effort will enable end users to enjoy a more dynamic and enhanced application BUT … a customer will always be less frustrated by an absent feature than by one that doesn’t work.

In conclusion, no matter how much QA time and effort you invest, you will always need tech support. But our main goal is to find the magic formulas that enable us to balance the equation between the two.

May 13, 2008

The Marketer's Apprentice

Two more signs that nothing stays the same:

The largest of the large marketers are now embracing sampling programs like never before.  Why is this interesting?  Sampling was once the tactic used by those who couldn’t afford large-scale advertising.  There are lots of implications here, but the one I find fascinating: what does this say about the waning efficacy of traditional Interruption Marketing?

Meanwhile, speaking of Interruption Marketing, there’s another chink in its armor – Honey, I Shrunk the Audience. Seems that six million prime time viewers have gone missing since last year this time.  So if ads are less effective, and there are fewer consumers viewing them, what’s a marketer to do?

Go Direct! No surprise … that’s sort of what we’ve been advocating.

May 09, 2008

This Week's Photo

This is the new photo for the Comedy Captions contest with Fuelmyblog.

If you'd like to participate, you can post as many captions as you like on Fuel's blog. The live draw will occur next week. The winner is entitled to a Blog2Print book or another book of their choice.

May 07, 2008

Comedy Captions w/ Fuelmyblog

Congratulations to Sue, the winner of this week's Comedy Captions contest with Fuelmyblog. Here's the winning caption:

Green suit: $79
Tambourine: $12
Getting the band back together: Priceless.

UPDATE: The next photo is posted here.

May 02, 2008

Mother's Day Gift Ideas

Bigstockphoto_happy_mother_s_day_he Soon after we introduced Your Daily Inspiring Word, the first personalized 365-day devotional, we realized that the book would be a thoughtful and unique gift idea for Mother's Day. Since it takes a few days to produce the personalized book, we just posted a gift certificate that can be purchased up until 6:00 p.m. EST on Thursday for last minute shoppers.

If a personalized Christian prayer book doesn't sound like the right choice for your mom, gift certificates are also available for Create-A-Cookbook from Allrecipes.com and the BigOven Cookbook.